The promisor can also sue the promisor for not having paid the third beneficiary. Under the Common Law, such actions were excluded, but the courts have since ruled that the promise of some performance of the contract could bring an action, unless the beneficiary had already sued the promisor. If the beneficiary of the promise has found himself in a debt to a creditor and the omission of the promiser to honor the claim has led to the promise being made liable for that debt, the promise to collect the amount of the debt may bring legal action. Faster notification Buyer pays audits at any time and develops work order systems as a model for service agreements A third party beneficiary under contract law is a person who may have the right to continue a contract when he or she was not an active party to the contract originally. This right, called ius quaesitum tertio, arises when the third party (tertius or alteri) is the beneficiary of the envisaged contract and not a mere random beneficiary (penitus extraneus). It gives the third party the right to sue either the promiser (promoter or performing party) or the promisor (stipulans or anchor) of the contract, depending on the circumstances in which the relationship arose. A third party is a person who is not a contracting party. The Common Law recognizes three important third parties: another example concerns obtaining all necessary consents, an obligation of the tenant that is usually included in every modification license. The contractor must be very careful to carefully consider the commitments he may make to the employer/tenant under the third-party contract in relation to his obligations under the construction contract. This may be a classic case of obligations imposed by the back door.
For example, the construction contract may be completely silent about who needs to get the building permit. Alternatively, the construction contract may provide that the contractor`s obligations consist solely in assisting the employer in obtaining all necessary authorizations, but it is the employer`s responsibility to obtain them effectively. If the modification authorization stipulates that the tenant is absolutely bound by all the authorizations necessary for the execution of the work (for example.B. Building permit, allocation of party walls, etc.) Under the clause of the third-party contract, the contractor assumes this obligation, which is often the case, as if it were fixed directly in the construction contract. . . .